– Landmark Decision Rendered By The United States Supreme Court Uses Case Presented To It By Keven Steinberg In Issuing Landmark Decision Overturning Legal Precedent
BREAKING NEWS – [June 28, 2024] The U.S. Supreme Court dissent relied on a case presented to it earlier by Keven Steinberg, while the majority of Justices overturned a forty-year-old legal precedent that instructed judges about when they could defer to federal agencies’ interpretations of law in rulemaking. See, Chevron vs. Natural Resources, 467 U.S. 837 (1984) https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/467/837/
In altering decades-old well-established law, on June 28, 2024, the U.S. Supreme Court in the matter of Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo, 22-451 (06/28/2024) 22-451 Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo (06/28/2024) (law360.com) the dissenting Justices relied in part on the case of Encino Motorcars, LLC v. Navarro, 579 U. S. 211, 220 (2016), (a case twice presented to the United States Supreme Court by Keven Steinberg in their reasoning and opinions) to fight for the longevity of the “Chevron Rule”.
Keven Steinberg and Steinberg Law are proud to have established and have been part of legal precedents and impacted the U.S. Supreme Court (now, three (3) times!) in 2011, 2016, and now again in 2024.
Additional Resources
Axios
https://search.app/KBjpKYvMfBHeaFDC9
Source: SCOTUSblog